Comments (0)

By Kiran, February 16, 2010 12:06 am

I’ve loved this song for a long time, just saw the video for the first time today. Amazing…

Comments (0)

By Kiran, February 15, 2010 3:55 pm

Message to liberals in the west: Islamic Imperialists (aka Islamists) are NOT human rights activists. If you want to help the underdog, the dissident, the progressive, then stand up for, listen to, support and speak with liberals, progressives and secularists from Muslim backgrounds, not the authoritarians, the clerical classes, or the Islamic cultural supremacists who want to hide behind your progressive ideals.

Case in point: Amnesty International has lost sight of its original purpose.

*sigh*

Comments (0)

By Kiran, February 12, 2010 10:59 pm

If you haven’t seen this yet, here’s your chance It’s a well researched critical analysis of this current hot-button issue.

Aafia Siddiqui VS (Jews, Zarina Mari, Shazia Khalid and others) by Anas Abbas

Comments (0)

By Kiran, January 4, 2010 4:17 pm

Thanks to a Facebook friend, I came across this article in the Times Online which reports on zoological findings that dolphins’ brains, cultural and emotional complexities, and behaviours are close to those of humans. I think this is significant because there are more and more people waking up to the realities of how we treat non-human animals, and what that implies for us and our humanity, as well as the correlations between cruelty towards other animals and cruelty towards humans. If you know me at all, you know this is one of the most important fields of study, reflection and activism to me. Some excerpts from the Times Online article:

The researchers argue that their work shows it is morally unacceptable to keep such intelligent animals in amusement parks or to kill them for food or by accident when fishing. Some 300,000 whales, dolphins and porpoises die in this way each year.

“Many dolphin brains are larger than our own and second in mass only to the human brain when corrected for body size,” said Lori Marino, a zoologist at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, who has used magnetic resonance imaging scans to map the brains of dolphin species and compare them with those of primates.

<snip>

In one study, Diana Reiss, professor of psychology at Hunter College, City University of New York, showed that bottlenose dolphins could recognise themselves in a mirror and use it to inspect various parts of their bodies, an ability that had been thought limited to humans and great apes.

In another, she found that captive animals also had the ability to learn a rudimentary symbol-based language.

Other research has shown dolphins can solve difficult problems, while those living in the wild co-operate in ways that imply complex social structures and a high level of emotional sophistication.

<snip>

Researchers have found that brain size varies hugely from around 7oz for smaller cetacean species such as the Ganges River dolphin to more than 19lb for sperm whales, whose brains are the largest on the planet. Human brains, by contrast, range from 2lb-4lb, while a chimp’s brain is about 12oz.When it comes to intelligence, however, brain size is less important than its size relative to the body.

What Marino and her colleagues found was that the cerebral cortex and neocortex of bottlenose dolphins were so large that “the anatomical ratios that assess cognitive capacity place it second only to the human brain”. They also found that the brain cortex of dolphins such as the bottlenose had the same convoluted folds that are strongly linked with human intelligence.

Such folds increase the volume of the cortex and the ability of brain cells to interconnect with each other. “Despite evolving along a different neuroanatomical trajectory to humans, cetacean brains have several features that are correlated with complex intelligence,” Marino said.

There was a time when women, black people, mentally ill people, children, were all in various ways regarded as “sub human”, as inanimate objects, to be used, abused, and discarded. Today, we still have some segments of populations arguing for the lack of any rights of non-human animals. This will change, in time, and our current practices of cruel factory farming, animal testing, breeding for entertainment, etc., will, I can say with a some confidence and a lot of hope for the sake of humanity, become more obsolete, and become as illegal and socially unacceptable as slavery, child labour, pederasty, misogyny and eugenics are now.

Comments (0)

By Kiran, January 2, 2010 11:43 pm

A British MP has caused some controversy by publicly stating that profiling of Muslims is to be expected in the light of recent events:

He said: “I think most people would rather be profiled than blown up. It wouldn’t be victimisation of an entire community.

What I like is that Muslim organizations and Muslims with influence are starting to finally speak up in mainstream society, bringing up important issues like the fact that many of the terrorist attacks happening in the world today are being committed by Muslims, and in the name of Islam.

What I don’t like is firstly that things have actually come to this, and secondly that profiling based on race or religion could really backfire. First of all, this opens a whole can of worms in terms of who is Muslim and who isn’t. Is it based on name? On one’s parents’ religion? What’s next? Requiring people to put their religion or religious background on their passports? Like what was done to Jews in Soviet Russia? And how hard would it be for someone to bypass such a superficial system of checks: a change of name, a change of outfit?

I do think that people of certain names, backgrounds, looks and ages will, and it could be easily argued, should, be scrutinized more than the mostly superficial checks that airline passengers are subject to. However, I think the issue needs to be approached intelligently, to find efficient solutions (and there have to be many complementary solutions, there really is no one simple magic answer), that precisely and successfully help identify and quarantine those who intend to use public spaces as personal, fatal soap boxes. We could start by hiring people of higher and more sophisticated educational backgrounds to screen passengers, and we could invest in providing training to airport personnel to better understand things like body signals, psychology, etc.

All of which leads me to wonder if perhaps we’re headed for this.

Your thoughts?